<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/3.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>BCPS Discussion</title>
		<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=3.3.3"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-14</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:33:38 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>kitiria</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">A-General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">57@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;As far As I know, you have hit it on spot. I am not a Stats expert but with respect to CI and odds ratios. That is correct.&amp;#160;I double checked in the study guide for biostat (the 2011 edition). It does state that CI for OR/RR&amp;#160;&amp;#160;with a 1 in it is insignificant. All other CI with a 0 in it's range is insignificant. &amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-14&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far As I know, you have hit it on spot. I am not a Stats expert but with respect to CI and odds ratios. That is correct.&#160;I double checked in the study guide for biostat (the 2011 edition). It does state that CI for OR/RR&#160;&#160;with a 1 in it is insignificant. All other CI with a 0 in it's range is insignificant. &#160;</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-14">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-14#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=57</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-13</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:23:24 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>cutant</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">A-General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">56@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;The reasoning I am using to know when significance counts for&amp;#160;CI=0 or CI=1 is the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a prospective trial (i.e. comparing 2 means or difference between 2 estimates e.g. cure rates as %) a CI that includes 0 means no difference between variables can be interpreted as statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For observational studies or epidemiologic trials (e.g. cohorts or case controls ) i.e. trials that will include odds ratios or relative risks (e.g. reduced MI) a value of 1 for RR means no dofference in risk and when CI&amp;#160;includes 1 there is statistical significance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In short this means for OR or RR, CI=1=insignificant&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In absence of OR / RR, CI=0=insignificant&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far this is working for me - I would appreciate if someone check it out.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-13&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reasoning I am using to know when significance counts for&#160;CI=0 or CI=1 is the following:</p>
<p>In a prospective trial (i.e. comparing 2 means or difference between 2 estimates e.g. cure rates as %) a CI that includes 0 means no difference between variables can be interpreted as statistically significant.</p>
<p>For observational studies or epidemiologic trials (e.g. cohorts or case controls ) i.e. trials that will include odds ratios or relative risks (e.g. reduced MI) a value of 1 for RR means no dofference in risk and when CI&#160;includes 1 there is statistical significance.</p>
<p>In short this means for OR or RR, CI=1=insignificant</p>
<p>In absence of OR / RR, CI=0=insignificant&#160;</p>
<p>So far this is working for me - I would appreciate if someone check it out.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-13">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/02/13/title-13#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=56</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/01/30/title-12</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:08:03 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>kickbcps2012</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">Statistics</category>
<category domain="main">A-General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">55@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;CI can be used for difference or RR/OR. For CI of difference, if 0 is included, no difference; For CI of RR/OR, when 1 is included, no difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please let me know if you need more clarification. my email is &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:xdf2008@gmail.com&quot;&gt;xdf2008@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/01/30/title-12&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CI can be used for difference or RR/OR. For CI of difference, if 0 is included, no difference; For CI of RR/OR, when 1 is included, no difference.</p>
<p>Please let me know if you need more clarification. my email is <a href="http://drtedwilliams.netmailto:xdf2008@gmail.com">xdf2008@gmail.com</a>.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/01/30/title-12">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2012/01/30/title-12#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=55</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/29/title-11</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:24:29 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>fad2333</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">A-General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">54@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nice to join and get prepared for BCPS exam next year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/29/title-11&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>nice to join and get prepared for BCPS exam next year.</p>
<p>thanks</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/29/title-11">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/29/title-11#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=54</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/23/title-10</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>bdial</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Statistics</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">53@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;&quot;&gt;I have one specific stats question that is driving me crazy.&amp;#160; I have searched and searched, unsuccessfully, for a clear-cut answer on this one. &amp;#160;&amp;#160;It relates to confidence intervals.&amp;#160; I think that I am correct in stating that an inclusion of &amp;#8220;1&amp;#8221; within the confidence intervals of cohort (relative risk) and case-control (odds ratio) studies renders any such study statistically not significant. &amp;#160;&amp;#160;However, I have read in certain situations/study types (and seen in certain study question answers) when looking at confidence intervals that &amp;#8220;0&amp;#8221; within the confidence interval (not &amp;#8220;1&amp;#8221;) renders the study findings statistically not significant.&amp;#160; When is this the case AND how does one differentiate these cases from OR and/or RR (when &amp;#8220;1&amp;#8221; renders the findings stat. not significant)?&amp;#160; I would appreciate ANY advice that you can give on this one.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/23/title-10&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">I have one specific stats question that is driving me crazy.&#160; I have searched and searched, unsuccessfully, for a clear-cut answer on this one. &#160;&#160;It relates to confidence intervals.&#160; I think that I am correct in stating that an inclusion of &#8220;1&#8221; within the confidence intervals of cohort (relative risk) and case-control (odds ratio) studies renders any such study statistically not significant. &#160;&#160;However, I have read in certain situations/study types (and seen in certain study question answers) when looking at confidence intervals that &#8220;0&#8221; within the confidence interval (not &#8220;1&#8221;) renders the study findings statistically not significant.&#160; When is this the case AND how does one differentiate these cases from OR and/or RR (when &#8220;1&#8221; renders the findings stat. not significant)?&#160; I would appreciate ANY advice that you can give on this one.&#160;&#160;</span></span></p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/23/title-10">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/23/title-10#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=53</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-9</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>sommejm</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">A-General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">52@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;There may be more answers discussed within the BioStats chapter, but they were hard to find bc they are embedded in the notes. If you post the page numbers, I can try to find more. Hope this helps.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pg 149 Descriptive Stats Example&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sample Data Set Mean = 60.8 Median = 61 Mode = 65&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Std Deviation = no answer given, will not be expected to calculate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Range can be reported as either 87 - 46 or 41&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pg 154-155 Rosuvastatin vs Simvastatin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which is the most appropriate stat test to determine baseline differences in&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A) Sex: Chi Squared&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;B) LDL: Independent t test aka 2 sample&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;C) % smoker vs. non-smoker: Chi Squared&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which is the most appropriate test to determine:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A) Effect of rosuvastatin on LDL: Wilcoxen Signed Rank Sum&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Very confusing to the group. The key here (as explained) is that the samples are Paired. The measurements in the rosuvastatin group at baseline and compared against the same patients again at the 3 month mark. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;B) The primary endpoint: 2 Sample t test&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pg 158 Regression example&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8c. i. Parametric, continuous values&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ii. 31% of variability in Factor Xa conc. is explained by the Enox dose&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iii. For 2mg ~ 0.5 U/mL; Cannot predict 3.75 because it is outside range of the experiment&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-9&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There may be more answers discussed within the BioStats chapter, but they were hard to find bc they are embedded in the notes. If you post the page numbers, I can try to find more. Hope this helps.</em></p>
<p>pg 149 Descriptive Stats Example</p>
<p>Sample Data Set Mean = 60.8 Median = 61 Mode = 65</p>
<p>Std Deviation = no answer given, will not be expected to calculate</p>
<p>Range can be reported as either 87 - 46 or 41</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>pg 154-155 Rosuvastatin vs Simvastatin</p>
<p>Which is the most appropriate stat test to determine baseline differences in</p>
<p>A) Sex: Chi Squared</p>
<p>B) LDL: Independent t test aka 2 sample</p>
<p>C) % smoker vs. non-smoker: Chi Squared</p>
<p>Which is the most appropriate test to determine:</p>
<p>A) Effect of rosuvastatin on LDL: Wilcoxen Signed Rank Sum</p>
<p><em>Very confusing to the group. The key here (as explained) is that the samples are Paired. The measurements in the rosuvastatin group at baseline and compared against the same patients again at the 3 month mark. </em></p>
<p>B) The primary endpoint: 2 Sample t test</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>pg 158 Regression example</p>
<p>8c. i. Parametric, continuous values</p>
<p>ii. 31% of variability in Factor Xa conc. is explained by the Enox dose</p>
<p>iii. For 2mg ~ 0.5 U/mL; Cannot predict 3.75 because it is outside range of the experiment</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-9">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-9#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=52</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-8</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>sommejm</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">A-General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">51@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-8&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-8">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/09/14/title-8#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=51</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/08/07/title-7</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 15:02:16 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>kesamai</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Statistics</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">50@http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I just wanted to know if anyone has the answers to the review questions from the ACCP review book for the Biostats refresher. I have the self-test questions in the back of the chapter, but there is no key for the questions throughout the chapter... I would love to know if I am on the right track....any suggestions or help?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/08/07/title-7&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just wanted to know if anyone has the answers to the review questions from the ACCP review book for the Biostats refresher. I have the self-test questions in the back of the chapter, but there is no key for the questions throughout the chapter... I would love to know if I am on the right track....any suggestions or help?</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/08/07/title-7">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php/2011/08/07/title-7#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drtedwilliams.net/BCPSBlog/blog5.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=50</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>

